compare/Claude Opus 4.8vsKimi-K2.6

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Kimi-K2.6

Pricing, context window, capabilities, and release date — pulled from each provider's public docs. Both are available via the same AIgateway OpenAI-compatible endpoint; flip the model string to switch.

RUN BOTH LIVE

Paste a prompt. Watch them race.

Both models stream in parallel through your own AIgateway key. Tokens, latency, and cost update as they arrive.

Sign in to runLive streaming uses your own key. It's free to sign up.
 Claude Opus 4.8
anthropic/claude-opus-4.8
Kimi-K2.6
moonshot/kimi-k2.6
ProviderAnthropicMoonshot
FamilyClaude 4Kimi
Modalitytexttext
Context window1,000,000 tok262,144 tok
Max output128,000 tok16,384 tok
Released2026-05-282026-04-20
Input price$5.00 /1M$0.950 /1M
Output price$25.00 /1M$4.00 /1M
Cache read$0.500 /1M$0.160 /1M
Toolsyesyes
Streamingyesyes
Visionyesyes
JSON modeyesyes
Reasoningyesyes
Prompt cachingyesyes
Claude Opus 4.8
anthropic/claude-opus-4.8
Full spec →

Claude Opus 4.8 is Anthropic's most capable generally available model, with a step-change improvement in agentic coding over Claude Opus 4.7. It uses adaptive thinking to calibrate reasoning per task and supports a one million token context window at standard pricing.

Strengths
  • Anthropic's most capable model — #1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
  • Best computer-use / browser agent tested (84% on Online-Mind2Web)
  • Adaptive thinking — calibrates reasoning depth per task
  • ~4× less likely than Opus 4.7 to let code flaws pass unremarked
  • More efficient tool calling — fewer steps for the same result
Kimi-K2.6
moonshot/kimi-k2.6
Full spec →

Kimi K2.6 is a frontier-scale open-source 1T parameter model with a 262.1k context window, multi-turn tool calling, vision inputs, and structured outputs for agentic workloads.

Strengths
  • Frontier-scale 1T parameters, open-weight
  • ~10× cheaper than Opus
  • Multi-turn tool calling + vision
SWITCH BETWEEN THEM

One key, both models, one line different.

# pip install aigateway-py openai
# aigateway-py: sub-accounts, evals, replays, jobs, webhook verify.
# openai SDK: chat/embeddings/images/audio — drop-in compat per our SDK's own guidance.
from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.aigateway.sh/v1",
    api_key="sk-aig-...",
)

# Try Claude Opus 4.8
client.chat.completions.create(
    model="anthropic/claude-opus-4.8",
    messages=[{"role":"user","content":"hello"}],
)

# Try Kimi-K2.6 — same client, same key
client.chat.completions.create(
    model="moonshot/kimi-k2.6",
    messages=[{"role":"user","content":"hello"}],
)
Get an AIgateway keyAdd a third model

Compare with another

Kimi-K2.6 vs Claude Opus 4.7
moonshot/kimi-k2.6 · anthropic/claude-opus-4.7
GPT-5.4 vs Kimi-K2.6
openai/gpt-5.4 · moonshot/kimi-k2.6
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Kimi-K2.6
google/gemini-3.1-pro · moonshot/kimi-k2.6
Kimi-K2.6 vs Kimi-K2.5
moonshot/kimi-k2.6 · moonshot/kimi-k2.5
Kimi-K2.6 vs Llama-4-Scout-17b-16e-Instruct
moonshot/kimi-k2.6 · meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct
Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
anthropic/claude-opus-4.8 · anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6
Claude Opus 4.8 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
anthropic/claude-opus-4.8 · xai/grok-4.20-multi-agent-0309
Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.4
anthropic/claude-opus-4.8 · openai/gpt-5.4
Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
anthropic/claude-opus-4.8 · google/gemini-2.5-pro